Problem 32 — Visual explainer (undergrad) ========================================= Problem statement --------------- Is there a set $A\subset\mathbb{N}$ such that\[\lvert A\cap\{1,\ldots,N\}\rvert = o((\log N)^2)\]and such that every large integer can be written as $p+a$ for some prime $p$ and $a\in A$? Can the bound $O(\log N)$ be achieved? Must such an $A$ satisfy\[\liminf \frac{\lvert A\cap\{1,\ldots,N\}\rvert}{\log N}> 1?\] Picture ------- Target integer N as "prime + offset": N = p + a ^ ^ prime pick a from A Think: A is a small "menu of offsets" that helps you hit all large N. Question: what to look at ------------------------ - Restate the problem as: given the constraint, what asymptotic bound or structure must follow? - Use the comments as benchmarks (best known bounds / constructions). Context ------- Area hint: additive number theory (primes) / sieve methods. Notation (if it appears above) ----------------------------- - `o(g(n))` means "grows strictly smaller than g(n)" (ratio → 0 as nā†’āˆž). - `O(g(n))` means "at most a constant times g(n)" for large n. Benchmarks / known results (from comments) ---------------------------------------- - Erd\H{o}s proved that such a set $A$ exists with $\lvert A\cap\{1,\ldots,N\}\rvert\ll (\log N)^2$ (improving a previous result of Lorentz who achieved $\ll (\log N)^3$). - Wolke has shown that such a bound is almost true, in that we can achieve $\ll (\log N)^{1+o(1)}$ if we only ask for almost all integers to be representable. - Kolountzakis improved this to $\ll (\log N)(\log\log N)$, and Ruzsa further improved this to $\ll \omega(N)\log N$ for any $\omega\to \infty$. - The answer to the third question is yes: Ruzsa has shown that we must have\[\liminf \frac{\lvert A\cap\{1,\ldots,N\}\rvert}{\log N}\geq e^\gamma\approx 1.781.\]This is discussed in problem E1 of Guy's collection, where it is stated that Erd\H{o}s offered \$50 for determining whether $O(\log N)$ can be achieved.