A sequence is said to be $d$-complete if every large integer is the sum of distinct integers from the sequence, none of which divide any other. This particular case of $d$-completeness was conjectured by Erd\H{o}s and Lewin \cite{ErLe96}, who (among other related results) prove this when $a=3$, $b=5$, and $c=7$. As a partial record of progress so far, the sequence $\{a^kb^lc^m\}$ is known to be $d$-complete when: {UL} {LI}$a=3$, $b=5$, $c=7$ (Erd\H{o}s and Lewin \cite{ErLe96}).{/LI} {LI}$a=2$, $b=5$, $c\in \{7,11,13,17,19\}$ (Erd\H{o}s and Lewin \cite{ErLe96}).{/LI} {LI}$a=2$, $b=5$, $c\in \{9,21,23,27,29,31\}$ - more generally, $a=2$, $b=5$, and any $c>6$ with $(c,10)=1$ such that there exists $N$ where every integer in $(N,25cN)$ is the sum of distinct elements of $\{2^k3^lc^m\}$, none of which divide any other (Ma and Chen \cite{MaCh16}).{/LI} {LI} $a=2$, $b=5$, $3\leq c\leq 87$ with $(c,10)=1$, or $a=2$, $b=7$, $3\leq c\leq 33$ with $(c,14)=1$, or $a=3$, $b=5$, $2\leq c\leq 14$ with $(c,15)=1$ (Chen and Yu \cite{ChYu23b}).{/LI} {/UL} In \cite{Er92b} Erd\H{o}s makes the stronger conjecture (for $a=2$, $b=3$, and $c=5$) that, for any $\epsilon>0$, all large integers $n$ can be written as the sum of distinct integers $b_1<\cdots